Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration
Дата
Msg-id 20200923015018.GC16803@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:45:14PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> However, I still think the integer type use is a bit inconsistent.  In both
> cases, using strtoul() and dealing with unsigned integer types between
> parsing and final use would be more consistent.

No objections to that either, so changed this way.  I kept those
variables signed because applying values of 2B~4B is not really going
to matter much here ;p
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Syncing pg_multixact directories
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer