Re: Autovacuum of independent tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: Autovacuum of independent tables
Дата
Msg-id 20200909135928.GN29590@tamriel.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Autovacuum of independent tables  (Michael Holzman <michaelholzman@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Greetings,

* Michael Holzman (michaelholzman@gmail.com) wrote:
> I have two applications A and B. A runs SELECT statements only and only on
> tableA. B actively updates tableB, A never looks into tableB. B has nothing
> to do with tableA.

In an ideal world, such distinct applications would probably do better
to live in independent PG clusters, which would address this issue with
VACUUM'ing and also allow you to do file-level backup/restore of each
independently, scale physical replicas independently, as well as manage
roles to be specific for each without seeing others, etc.

Thanks,

Stephen

Вложения

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brajendra Pratap Singh
Дата:
Сообщение: Schema/ROLE Rename Issue
Следующее
От: Brajendra Pratap Singh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Schema/ROLE Rename Issue