Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Дата
Msg-id 20200904012334.GF19499@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 03:26:03PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> The 0001 patch isn't strictly necessary but it seems reasonable to address the
>> various ways OpenSSL was spelled out in the docs while at updating the SSL
>> portions.  It essentially ensures that markup around OpenSSL and SSL is used
>> consistently.  I didn't address the linelengths being too long in this patch to
>> make review easier instead.
>
> I'll take a look.

Adding a <productname> markup around OpenSSL in the docs makes things
consistent.  +1.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [NBTREE] Possible NULL pointer dereference (backend/access/nbtree/nbutils.c)