Re: clarify "rewritten" in pg_checksums docs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: clarify "rewritten" in pg_checksums docs
Дата
Msg-id 20200902082348.GD2129@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: clarify "rewritten" in pg_checksums docs  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Ответы Re: clarify "rewritten" in pg_checksums docs
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 03:44:06PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Well, I was thinking less technically accurate and more descriptive for end
> users, hiding the implementation details.  "Rewrite" sounds to me more like
> changing data rather than amending pages with a checksum keeping data intact.
> Either way, adding "in-place" is an improvement IMO.

Using rewritten still sounds more adapted to me, as we still write the
thing with chunks of size BLCKSZ.  No objections with the addition of
"in-place" for that sentence.  Any extra opinions?
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Include access method in listTables output
Следующее
От: John Naylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?