On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 01:14:33AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > ... Another advantage of master-only is a guarantee against
> > disrupting time-critical patches. (It would be ugly to push back branches and
> > sort out the master push later, but it doesn't obstruct the mission.)
>
> Hm, doesn't it? I had the idea that "git push" is atomic --- either all
> the per-branch commits succeed, or they all fail. I might be wrong.
Atomicity is good. I just meant that you could issue something like "git push
origin $(cd .git/refs/heads && ls REL*)" to defer the complaint about master.