Re: PROC_IN_ANALYZE stillborn 13 years ago

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: PROC_IN_ANALYZE stillborn 13 years ago
Дата
Msg-id 20200807213544.GA3434@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PROC_IN_ANALYZE stillborn 13 years ago  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: PROC_IN_ANALYZE stillborn 13 years ago  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Aug-05, Andres Freund wrote:

> I'm mildly against that, because I'd really like to start making use of
> the flag. Not so much for cancellations, but to avoid the drastic impact
> analyze has on bloat.  In OLTP workloads with big tables, and without
> disabled cost limiting for analyze (or slow IO), the snapshot that
> analyze holds is often by far the transaction with the oldest xmin.

I pushed despite the objection because it seemed that downstream
discussion was largely favorable to the change, and there's a different
proposal to solve the bloat problem for analyze; and also:

> Only mildly against because it'd not be hard to reintroduce once we need
> it.

Thanks for the discussion!

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Issue with cancel_before_shmem_exit while searching to remove a particular registered exit callbacks
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PROC_IN_ANALYZE stillborn 13 years ago