On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 07:58:54PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>On 2020-Jul-10, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> > postgres(1:12801)=# select * from brin_page_items(get_raw_page('mul',
>> > 2), 'mul');
>> > -[ RECORD 1
]----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----------------------------
>> > itemoffset | 1
>> > blknum | 0
>> > attnum | 1
>> > allnulls | f
>> > hasnulls | f
>> > placeholder | f
>> > value |
{\x010000001b0000002000000001000000e5700000e6700000e7700000e8700000e9700000ea700000eb700000ec700000ed700000ee700000ef
>> >
700000f0700000f1700000f2700000f3700000f4700000f5700000f6700000f7700000f8700000f9700000fa700000fb700000fc700000fd700000fe700000ff700
>> > 00000710000}
>>
>> Hmm. I'm not sure we can do much better, without making the function
>> much more complicated. I mean, even with regular BRIN indexes we don't
>> really know if the value is plain min/max, right?
>
>Maybe we can try to handle this with some other function that interprets
>the bytea in 'value' and returns a user-readable text. I think it'd
>have to be a superuser-only function, because otherwise you could easily
>cause a crash by passing a value of a different opclass. But since this
>seems a developer-only thing, that restriction seems fine to me.
>
Ummm, I disagree a superuser check is sufficient protection from a
segfault or similar issues. If we really want to print something nicer,
I'd say it needs to be a special function in the BRIN opclass.
>(I don't know what's a good way to represent a bloom filter, mind.)
>
Me neither, but I guess we could print either some stats (size, number
of bits set, etc.) and/or then the bitmap.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services