On 2020-Jun-17, Fujii Masao wrote:
> The document explains that restart_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view is:
>
> The address (LSN) of oldest WAL which still might be required by
> the consumer of this slot and thus won't be automatically removed
> during checkpoints.
>
> But the latter part is not true in v13 thanks to max_slot_wal_keep_size.
> I think that we need to update it as follows. Thought?
>
> The address (LSN) of oldest WAL which still might be required by
> the consumer of this slot and thus won't be automatically removed
> during checkpoints unless this LSN gets behind more than
> max_slot_wal_keep_size from the current LSN.
We just added the invalidated_at LSN to replication slots; while working
on the tests for that today, I was thinking that it might be useful to
display that LSN in pg_replication_slots. What do you think of the idea
of publishing the invalidated_at LSN in pg_replication_slot.restart_lsn
when the slot is invalid?
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services