Re: Postgresql13_beta1 (could not rename temporary statistics file)Windows 64bits

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Justin Pryzby
Тема Re: Postgresql13_beta1 (could not rename temporary statistics file)Windows 64bits
Дата
Msg-id 20200616041018.GR20404@telsasoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgresql13_beta1 (could not rename temporary statistics file)Windows 64bits  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Postgresql13_beta1 (could not rename temporary statistics file)Windows 64bits  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:49:33PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> I can confirm that the problem is in pgrename (dirmod.c),
> something is not OK, with MoveFileEx, even with the
> (MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING) flag.
> 
> Replacing MoveFileEx, with
> unlink (to);
> rename (from, to);
> 
> #if defined (WIN32) &&! defined (__ CYGWIN__)
> unlink(to);
> while (rename (from, to)! = 0)
> #else
> while (rename (from, to) <0)
> #endif
> 
> The log messages have disappeared.
> 
> I suspect that if the target (to) file exists, MoveFileEx, it is failing to
> rename, even with the flag enabled.
> 
> Windows have the native rename function (
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/c-runtime-library/reference/rename-wrename?view=vs-2019
> )
> However, it fails if the target (to) file exists.
> 
> Question, is it acceptable delete the target file, if it exists, to
> guarantee the rename?

I don't think so - the idea behind writing $f.tmp and renaming it to $f is that
it's *atomic*.

I found an earlier thread addressing the same problem - we probably both
should've found this earlier.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/2230/

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAPpHfds9trA6ipezK3BsuuOSQwEmESiqj8pkOxACFJpoLpcoNw%40mail.gmail.com#9b04576b717175e9dbf03cc991977d3f

That thread goes back to 2017, so I don't think this is a new problem in v13.
I'm not sure why you wouldn't also see the same behavior in v12.

There's a couple patches in that thread, and the latest patch was rejected.

Maybe you'd want to test them out and provide feedback.

BTW, the first patch does:

!               if (filePresent)
!               {
!                       if (ReplaceFile(to, from, NULL, REPLACEFILE_IGNORE_MERGE_ERRORS, 0, 0))
!                               break;
!               }
!               else
!               {
!                       if (MoveFileEx(from, to, MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING))
!                               break;
!               }

Since it's racy to first check if the file exists, I would've thought we should
instead do:

    ret = ReplaceFile()
    if ret == OK:
        break
    else if ret == FileDoesntExist:
        if MoveFileEx():
            break

Or, should we just try to create a file first, to allow ReplaceFile() to always
work ?

-- 
Justin



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Failures with wal_consistency_checking and 13~
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Missing links between system catalog documentationpages