At Mon, 25 May 2020 07:44:09 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote in
> Hi all,
>
> I have been playing with the new APIs of xlogreader.h, and while
> merging some of my stuff with 13, I found the handling around
> ->seg.ws_file overcomplicated and confusing as it is necessary for a
> plugin to manipulate directly the fd of an opened segment in the WAL
> segment open/close callbacks.
That depends on where we draw responsibility border, or who is
responsible to the value of ws_file. I think that this API change was
assuming the callbacks having full-knowledge of the xlogreader struct
and are responsible to maintain related struct members, and I agree to
that direction.
> Wouldn't it be cleaner to limit the exposition of ->seg.ws_file to the
> user if possible? There are cases like a WAL sender where you cannot
> do that, but something that came to my mind is to make
> WALSegmentOpenCB return the fd of the opened segment, and pass down the
> fd to close to WALSegmentCloseCB. Then xlogreader.c is in charge of
> resetting the field when a segment is closed.
>
> Any thoughts?
If we are going to hide the struct from the callbacks, we shouldn't
pass to the callbacks a pointer to the complete XLogReaderState
struct.
regards.
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center