Greetings,
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
> > Am I (again) alone in finding this a bit hokey? That a user name just
> > happens to be a schema name ...
>
> That's actually strongly encouraged by the SQL spec, if memory serves.
... and all-but-required by some other database systems. Doesn't make
it a good idea tho, imv.
Thanks,
Stephen