Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200512181807.obxxdbrbalrdadht@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 02:25:23PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: >On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 06:48:02PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote: >>On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 3:19 PM Tomas Vondra >><tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>I'm generally OK with most of this - I'd probably keep the single-line >>>format, but I don't feel very strongly about that and if others think >>>using two lines is better ... >>> >>>Barring objections I'll get this polished and pushed soon-ish (say, >>>early next week). >> >>I see something about starting a new thread on the Open Items page. >>Please CC me on this. >> >>Speaking in my capacity as an RMT member: Glad to see that you plan to >>close this item out next week. (I had planned on giving you a nudge >>about this, but it looks like I don't really have to now.) >> > >Not sure about about the new thread - the discussion continues on the >main incremental sort thread, I don't see any proposal to start a new >thread there. IMO it'd be pointless at this point. > I've pushed both patches, fixing typos and explain format. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: