On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 01:45:37PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > | This is controlled by GUC wal_skip_threshold.
> > > > > I think you should say that's a size threshold which determines which strategy
> > > > > to use (WAL or fsync).
> > > >
> > > > I went with:
> > > > The WAL write amount where this happens is controlled by wal_skip_threshold.
> > > >
> > > > They can use the doc link if they want more detail.
> > >
> > > I guess I would say "relations larger than wal_skip_threshold will be fsynced
> > > rather than copied to WAL"
> >
> > How is this?
> >
> > Relations larger than wal_skip_threshold will have their files fynsced
> > rather than writing their WAL records.
>
> I see I was too late, but:
>
> Fix typo (fynsc) and maybe add parens().
Ah, I was looking for fsync to fix that and could not find it. Now I
found it with that spelling, I ended up using "fsync'ed".
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +