Re: [PATCH] Fix possible overflow on tuplesort.c

On 2020-Apr-16, Ranier Vilela wrote:

> When multiplying variables, the overflow will take place anyway, and only
> then will the meaningless product be explicitly promoted to type int64.
> It is one of the operands that should have been cast instead to avoid the
> overflow.
>
> -   if (state->availMem < (int64) ((newmemtupsize - memtupsize) * sizeof(SortTuple)))
> +   if (state->availMem < ((int64) (newmemtupsize - memtupsize) * sizeof(SortTuple)))

Doesn't sizeof() return a 64-bit wide value already?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services