Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
От
Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
Тема
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery
Дата
Msg-id
20200422004121.516a5a32@firost
Ответ на
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery (Michael Paquier)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Hello,
I did another round of review of v8.
- LocalRecoveryInProgress = xlogctl->SharedRecoveryInProgress;
+ LocalRecoveryInProgress = (xlogctl->SharedRecoveryState !=
RECOVERY_STATE_DONE);
Do we need to acquire info_lck to look at the state here, as we do in
GetRecoveryState()? Why is it missing from previous code where
SharedRecoveryInProgress was protected by info_lck as well?
Plus, the new line length overflow the 80-column, but I'm not sure where to
break this line.
+if ($Config{osname} eq 'MSWin32')
+{
+
+ # some Windows Perls at least don't like IPC::Run's start/kill_kill
regime.
+ plan skip_all => "Test fails on Windows perl";
+}
In fact, this was inherited from 011_crash_recovery.pl where I originally
added some tests. As 020_archive_status.pl doesn't use IPC::Run, the comment is
wrong. But I wonder if this whole block is really needed. Unfortunately I can't
test on MSWin32 :/
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:15:01 +0900
Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Indeed, Benoît Lobréau reported this behavior to me.
>
> Noted. Thanks for the information. I don't think that I have ever
> met Benoît in person, do I?
I don't think so.
> Tell him that I owe him one beer or a beverage of his choice when we meet
> IRL, and that he had better use this message-id to make me keep my promise :)
I told him (but I'm sure he was reading anyway :)).
Regards,
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Michael Paquier
Дата: