On 2020-Apr-08, Antonin Houska wrote:
> Specifically for 2PC, isn't it better to close some OS-level FD of an
> unrelated table scan and then succeed than to ERROR immediately? Anyway,
> 0dc8ead46 hasn't changed this.
I think for full generality of the interface, we pass a "close" callback
in addition to the "open" callback. But if we were to pass it only for
WALRead, then there would be no way to call it during XLogReaderFree.
I think the fix Andres applied is okay as far as it goes, but for the
long term we may want to change the interface even further -- maybe by
having these functions be part of the XLogReader state struct. I have
this code paged out of my head ATM, but maybe tomorrow I can give it a
little think.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services