Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption
Дата
Msg-id 20200420185530.kcecu5vafc3icnhk@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption
Список pgsql-bugs
Hi,

On 2020-04-11 20:35:52 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:21:54AM -0400, Ben Cornett wrote:

Ben, for the future, it's better to not drop CC addresses etc. I didn't
see this reply at the time you sent it, just when I was catching up on
my backlog of unread postgres email.


> > Did this patch ever get applied?  It is not clear to me that it did.

No :(. I lost track of it. I did recall that there was some patch I was
supposed to get back to, but couldn't remember what exactly :(.

It's really too bad that we don't have a bugtracker. I just can't keep
track of all bugs / patches where I e.g. want to wait a few days for a
reply (here to see whether Tom likes my alternative context based
approach).


> Hmmm, I don't think it got applied, which means we've missed yet another
> minor release :-(
> 
> Andres, any plans to push this?

Yea, I think I'll go for my alternative approach from
https://postgr.es/m/20191115024707.y5bcsb4oo4wzovu4%40alap3.anarazel.de

Greetings,

Andres Freund



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16378: Invalid memory access on interrupting CLUSTER after CREATE TEMP TABLE
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16112: large, unexpected memory consumption