Re: doc review for parallel vacuum

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 03:22:06PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:00 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > |Copy the index
> > |bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to
> > |the DSM segment if it's the first time [???] because they allocate locally
> > |and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by a different
> > |vacuum process the next time."
> >
> > Is it correct to say: "..if it's the first iteration" and "different process on
> > the next iteration" ?  Or "cycle" ?
> >
> 
> "cycle" sounds better.  I have changed the patch as per your latest
> comments.  Let me know what you think?

Looks good.  One more change:

[-Even if-]{+If+} this option is specified with the <option>ANALYZE</option> [-option-]{+option,+}

Remove "even" and add comma.

Thanks,
-- 
Justin