Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:33:57PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> We can add more tests to validate the syntax, but my worry was to not
> increase test timing by doing (parallel) vacuum.  So maybe we can do
> such syntax validation on empty tables or you have any better idea?

Using empty tables for positive tests is the least expensive option.
--
Michael