Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++
Дата
Msg-id
20200326035844.GB1471@paquier.xyz
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos@pm.me>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos@pm.me>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Refactor compile-time assertion checks for C/C++ Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:22:48AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, the comment needs an update; but if we have four implementations > then it ought to describe each of them, IMO. I got an idea as per the attached. Perhaps you have a better idea? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Michael Paquier
Дата: