Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Дата
Msg-id 20200325154652.GA13069@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Ответы Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2020-Mar-25, Justin Pryzby wrote:

> Maybe in the docs you can write this with thousands separators: 10,000,000
> 
> It looks like the GUC uses scale factor max=1e10, but the relopt is still
> max=100, which means it's less possible to disable for a single rel.

I have paid no attention to this thread, but how does it make sense to
have a scale factor to be higher than 100?  Surely you mean the
threshold value that should be set to ten million, not the scale factor?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andy Fan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Erase the distinctClause if the result is unique by definition
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)