Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200218185749.srk733n4z57lzxf2@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation
Re: Memory-Bounded Hash Aggregation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I wanted to take a look at this thread and do a review, but it's not very clear to me if the recent patches posted here are independent or how exactly they fit together. I see 1) hashagg-20200212-1.patch (2020/02/13 by Jeff) 2) refactor.patch (2020/02/13 by Jeff) 3) v1-0001-aggregated-unaggregated-cols-together.patch (2020/02/14 by Melanie) I suppose this also confuses the cfbot - it's probably only testing (3) as it's the last thing posted here, at least I think that's the case. And it fails: nodeAgg.c: In function ‘find_aggregated_cols_walker’: nodeAgg.c:1208:2: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement] FindColsContext *find_cols_context = (FindColsContext *) context; ^ nodeAgg.c: In function ‘find_unaggregated_cols_walker’: nodeAgg.c:1225:2: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Werror=declaration-after-statement] FindColsContext *find_cols_context = (FindColsContext *) context; ^ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors <builtin>: recipe for target 'nodeAgg.o' failed make[3]: *** [nodeAgg.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... It's probably a good idea to either start a separate thread for patches that are only loosely related to the main topic, or always post the whole patch series. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: