Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200207213519.mjgcvnpz6gn7pkyd@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans (Alexey Bashtanov <bashtanov@imap.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:22:12PM +0000, Alexey Bashtanov wrote: >Hello, > >>It took me a while to figure out what those names mean. "unfetched", >>as you call it on the code, may be more descriptive than "avoided" for >>the new label. However I think the other two are more confusing. It >>may be a good idea to change them together with this. >It'll be sad if this patch is forgotten only because of the words choice. >I've changed it all to "unfetched" for at least not to call the same >thing differently >in the code and in the output, and also rebased it and fit in 80 lines >width limit. > I kinda suspect one of the ressons why this got so little attention is that it was never added to any CF. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: