Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200116220012.h5sjb5e3czbrwjah@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] ltree, lquery, and ltxtquery binary protocol support
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:29:03AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Nino Floris wrote: >> Alright, as usual life got in the way. I've attached a new version of >> the patch with pgindent changes. >> >> > What do you think about writing patch for ALTER TYPE? >> I'd rather not :$ >> >> > 1) Write migration script, which directly updates pg_type. >> This sounds like the best option right now, if we don't want people to >> do manual migrations to ltree 1.2. >> How would I best go at this? >> >> > Travis has a small complaint: >> Should be fixed! > >The latest patch provided fails to apply for me on HEAD. Please >provide a rebase. For now I am bumping this patch to next CF with >"waiting on author" as status. Nino, any plans to submit a rebased/fixed patch, so that people can review it? Not sure if this needs a simple rebase or something more complex, all I know is cputube can't apply it. regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: