Re: RFC: seccomp-bpf support

On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 06:02:14AM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
>On 1/6/20 8:37 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch is currently in "needs review" state, but the last message is
>> from August 29, and my understanding is that there have been a couple of
>> objections / disagreements about the architecture, difficulties with
>> producing the set of syscalls, and not providing any built-in policy.
>>
>> I don't think we're any closer to resolve those disagreements since
>> August, so I think we should make some decision about this patch,
>> instead of just moving it from one CF to the next one. The "needs
>> review" status seems not reflecting the situation.
>>
>> Are there any plans to post a new version of the patch with a different
>> design, or something like that? If not, I propose we mark it either as
>> rejected or returned with feedback (and maybe get a new patch in the
>> future).
>
>
>I assumed it was rejected.
>

I don't know. I still see it in the CF app with "needs review" status:

   https://commitfest.postgresql.org/26/2263/

Barring objections, I'll mark it as rejected.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services