Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200105200603.wrb4beacwb57hhpk@development обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, I think we need to do something with having two patches aiming to add global temporary tables: [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/26/2349/ [2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/26/2233/ As a reviewer I have no idea which of the threads to look at - certainly not without reading both threads, which I doubt anyone will really do. The reviews and discussions are somewhat intermixed between those two threads, which makes it even more confusing. I think we should agree on a minimal patch combining the necessary/good bits from the various patches, and terminate one of the threads (i.e. mark it as rejected or RWF). And we need to do that now, otherwise there's about 0% chance of getting this into v13. In general, I agree with the sentiment Rober expressed in [1] - the patch needs to be as small as possible, not adding "nice to have" features (like support for parallel queries - I very much doubt just using shared instead of local buffers is enough to make it work.) regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: