Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
| От | David Fetter |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20191223200809.GI32763@fetter.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 02:34:34PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Hi all, > > I was working on some stuff for table AMs, and I got to wonder it we > had better rename amapi.h to indexam.h and amapi.c to indexam.c, so as > things are more consistent with table AM. It is a bit annoying to > name the files dedicated to index AMs with what looks like now a too > generic name. That would require switching a couple of header files > for existing module developers, which is always annoying, but the move > makes sense thinking long-term? +1 for being more specific about which AM we're talking about. Best, David. -- David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: