Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page
Дата
Msg-id 20191122225632.GA9169@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Attempt to consolidate reading of XLOG page  (Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Nov-22, Antonin Houska wrote:

> As I pointed out in
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/88183.1574261429%40antos
> 
> seg.ws_off only replaced readOff in XLogReaderState. So we should only update
> ws_off where readOff was updated before commit 709d003. This does happen in
> ReadPageInternal (see HEAD) and I see no reason for the final patch to update
> ws_off anywhere else.

Oh you're right.

I see no reason to leave ws_off.  We can move that to XLogReaderState; I
did that here.  We also need the offset in WALReadError, though, so I
added it there too.  Conceptually it seems clearer to me this way.

What do you think of the attached?

BTW I'm not clear what errors can pread()/pg_pread() report that do not
set errno.  I think lines 1083/1084 of WALRead are spurious now.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] (firsttupleslot)==NULL is redundant or is possible nulldereference?
Следующее
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [BUG] (firsttupleslot)==NULL is redundant or is possible nulldereference?