Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker
Дата
Msg-id 20191121133714.dezdkhqjuzejoegb@development
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker  (Ondřej Jirman <ienieghapheoghaiwida@xff.cz>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker  (Ondřej Jirman <ienieghapheoghaiwida@xff.cz>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 02:12:02PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:59:30PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:53:26PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> OK, so this is the problematic table. Any idea what operation triggers
>> the issue? Having a small reproducer (say, a single-row insert or so)
>> would be very helpful.
>
>Can something be extracted from the logical decoding data I sent in the other
>e-mail? That seems to contain the failing operation, but I don't know how to
>decode it off the top of my head from that binary representation.
>

Well, why not use pg_logical_slot_peek_changes()? That should be human
readable, I think.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker
Следующее
От: Ondřej Jirman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker