On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Eugen Konkov wrote:
> ! Specifying a missing bound as exclusive is automatically converted
> ! to inclusive, e.g., <literal>[,]</literal> is automatically converted
> ! to <literal>(,)</literal>
>
> Misspell?
>
> You say:
> exclusive is automatically converted to inclusive
> But then:
> [,] is automatically converted to (,)
>
> which one is correct?
My mistake. Thanks for finding that. Updated patch attached, plus I
improved the second paragraph.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +