Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
Дата
Msg-id 20191105150739.GA6833@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2019-Nov-05, Tom Lane wrote:

> Sure, because there wasn't any practical way to provide a transition
> period.  I think that case is entirely not comparable to this one,
> either as to whether a transition period is possible, or as to whether
> the benefits of the change merit forced breakage.

We're not forcing anyone into upgrading.  Older versions continue to
work, and many people still use those.  People who already upgraded
and needed a cross-version scriptable mechanism can already use
"-f/dev/stdout" as Justin documented in this thread's OP.  People
upgrading after next week release set can use "-f-".  People not
upgrading soon can keep their scripts for a while yet.

I think this teapot doesn't need the tempest, and nobody's drowning in
it anyway.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Keep compiler silence (clang 10, implicit conversion from 'long' to 'double' )
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)