Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc afterpg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc afterpg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12
Дата
Msg-id 20191013203848.2eksimmpux3546wr@development
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16045: vacuum_db crash and illegal memory alloc after pg_upgrade from PG11 to PG12  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 02:26:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> here is an updated patch, with the recursive CTE. I've done a fair
>> amount of testing on it on older versions (up to 9.4), and it seems to
>> work just fine.
>
>Might be a good idea to exclude attisdropped columns in the part of the
>recursive query that's looking for sql_identifier columns of composite
>types.  I'm not sure if composites can have dropped columns today,
>but even if they can't it seems like a wise bit of future-proofing.
>(We'll no doubt have occasion to use this logic again...)
>

Hmm? How could that be safe? Let's say we have a composite type with a
sql_identifier column, it's used in a table with data, and we drop the
column. We need the pg_type information to parse the existing, so how
could we skip attisdropped columns?

>Looks good other than that nit.
>
>> BTW the query (including the RELKIND_COMPSITE_TYPE) was essentially just
>> a lightly-massaged copy of old_9_6_check_for_unknown_data_type_usage, so
>> that seems wrong too.
>
>Yeah, we should back-port this logic into that check too, IMO.
>

You mean the recursive CTE, removal of RELKIND_COMPOSITE_TYPE or the
proposed change w.r.t. dropped columns?


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services 



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ERROR: invalid input syntax for integer: "0A000"
Следующее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #16054: Slowest individual queries