On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 01:47:57PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:55:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 05:40:08PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >> I would argue to include in 12.1, since 12 is what most everyone will use for
> > >> upgrades, and patch for .1 will help people upgrading for 11 of the next 12
> > >> months. (But, your patch is more general than mine).
> >
> > > No, there might be tools that depend on the existing format, and this is
> > > the first report of confusion I have read.
> >
> > Translations will also lag behind any such change. Speaking of which,
> > it might be a good idea to include some translator: annotations to
> > help translators understand what context these fragmentary phrases
> > are used in. I'd actually say that my biggest concern with these
> > messages is whether they can translate into something sane.
>
> Uh, I looked at the pg_ugprade code and the error message is:
>
> pg_fatal("Your installation contains \"contrib/isn\" functions which rely on the\n"
> "bigint data type. Your old and new clusters pass bigint values\n"
> "differently so this cluster cannot currently be upgraded. You can\n"
> "manually upgrade databases that use \"contrib/isn\" facilities and remove\n"
> "\"contrib/isn\" from the old cluster and restart the upgrade. A list of\n"
> "the problem functions is in the file:\n"
> " %s\n\n", output_path);
>
> and the "in database" (which I have changed to capitalized "In database"
> in the attached patch), looks like:
>
> fprintf(script, "In database: %s\n", active_db->db_name);
>
> meaning it _isn't_ an output error message, but rather something that
> appears in an error file. I don't think either of these are translated.
> Is that wrong?
Patch applied to head.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +