On Sun, Oct 06, 2019 at 03:47:46PM +0300, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:
> This message is follow up to the "Get rid of the StdRdOptions" patch thread:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2620882.s52SJui4ql@x200m
>
> I've split patch into even smaller parts and commitfest want each patch in
> separate thread. So it is new thread.
Splitting concepts into different threads may be fine, and usually
recommended. Splitting a set of patches into multiple entries to ease
review and your goal to get a patch integrated and posted all these
into the same thread is usually recommended. Now posting a full set
of patches across multiple threads, in way so as they have
dependencies with each other, is what I would call a confusing
situation. That's hard to follow.
> The idea of this patch is following: If you read the code, partitioned tables
> do not have any options (you will not find RELOPT_KIND_PARTITIONED in
> boolRelOpts, intRelOpts, realRelOpts, stringRelOpts and enumRelOpts in
> reloption.c), but it uses StdRdOptions to store them (these no options).
I am not even sure that we actually need that. What kind of reloption
you would think would suit into this subset?
--
Michael