Re: Efficient output for integer types

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:42:01AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:01:57AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 08:55:05AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 09:18:49AM +0200, David Fetter wrote:
> > > > Folks,
> > > > 
> > > > Please find attached a couple of patches intended to $subject.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch set cut the time to copy ten million rows of randomly sized
> > > > int8s (10 of them) by about a third, so at least for that case, it's
> > > > pretty decent.
> > > 
> > > Added int4 output, removed the sprintf stuff, as it didn't seem to
> > > help in any cases I was testing.
> > 
> > Found a couple of "whiles" that should have been "ifs."
> 
> Factored out some inefficient functions and made the guts use the more
> efficient function.

Fix copy-paste-o that introduced some unneeded 64-bit math.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate