On 2019-Aug-06, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Revised patch is attached. Changes to \dA+ command are reverted. It
> also contains some minor improvements.
>
> Second patch looks problematic for me, because it provides index
> description alternative to \d+. IMHO, if there is something really
> useful to display about index, we should keep it in \d+. So, I
> propose to postpone this.
Are you saying that we should mark this entire CF entry as Returned with
Feedback? Or do you see a subset of your latest 0001 as a commitable
patch?
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services