Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions
Дата
Msg-id 20190903103909.saxp6on62wvh5rqt@development
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 06:06:50PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>In the interest of moving things forward, how far are we from making
>0001 committable?  If I understand correctly, the rest of this patchset
>depends on https://commitfest.postgresql.org/24/944/ which seems to be
>moving at a glacial pace (or, actually, slower, because glaciers do
>move, which cannot be said of that other patch.)
>

I think 0001 is mostly there. I think there's one bug in this patch
version, but I need to check and I'll post an updated version shortly if
needed.

FWIW maybe we should stop comparing things to glaciers. 50 years from not
people won't know what a glacier is, and it'll be just like the floppy
icon on the save button.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XPRS
Следующее
От: Kuntal Ghosh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Patch] Invalid permission check in pg_stats for functional indexes