Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree

On 2019-Sep-03, Alexander Korotkov wrote:

> I think patches 0001-0008 are very clear and extends our index-AM
> infrastructure in query straightforward way.  I'm going to propose
> them for commit after some further polishing.

Hmm.  Why is 0001 needed?  I see that 0005 introduces a call to that
function, but if attnum == 0 then it doesn't call it.  Maybe it was
necessary in an older version of the patch?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services