On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:34:05AM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 11/04/2019 19:49, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hm, I think we should rather add it to sample. That's an oversight, not
>> intentional.
>
> I just noticed that this is still an issue. default_table_access_method is
> not in the sample config file, and it's not marked with GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE.
> I'll add this to the open items list so we don't forget.
I think that we should give it the same visibility as default_tablespace,
so adding it to the sample file sounds good to me.
--
Michael