Hi,
On 2019-08-06 10:58:15 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Michael Banck (michael.banck@credativ.de) wrote:
> > Independently of the whitelist/blacklist question, I believe
> > pg_checksums should not error out as soon as it encounters a weird looking
> > file, but either (i) still checksum it or (ii) skip it? Or is that to be
> > considered a pilot error and it's fine for pg_checksums to fold?
>
> imv, random files that we don't know about are exactly 'pilot error' to
> be complained about.. This is exactly why the whitelist idea falls
> over.
I still think this whole assumption is bad, and that you're fixing
non-problems, and creating serious usability issues with zero benefits.
Greetings,
Andres Freund