Greetings,
* Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2019-08-05 12:43:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > On the other hand, people have also opined that they want full error
> > checking on the inserted values, and that seems out of reach with less
> > than a full running system (mumble extensions mumble).
>
> I think the error checking ought to be about as complete as the one we
> do during a normal postmaster startup. Afaict that requires loading
> shared_preload_library extensions, but does *not* require booting up far
> enough to run GUC checks in a context with database access.
I'm not following this thread of the discussion.
You're not suggesting that pg_basebackup perform this error checking
after it modifies the file, are you..?
Where are you thinking this error checking would be happening?
Thanks,
Stephen