Re: concerns around pg_lsn

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: concerns around pg_lsn
Дата
Msg-id 20190804035701.GA7309@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: concerns around pg_lsn  (Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: concerns around pg_lsn  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2019-Aug-04, Jeevan Ladhe wrote:

> Sure Michael, in the attached patch I have reverted the checks from
> pg_lsn_in_internal() and added Assert() per my original patch.

Can we please change the macro definition so that have_error is one of
the arguments?  Having the variable be used inside the macro definition
but not appear literally in the call is quite confusing.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeevan Ladhe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: concerns around pg_lsn
Следующее
От: Daniel Migowski
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Patch to clean Query after rewrite-and-analyze - reduces memusageup to 50% - increases TPS by up to 50%