Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«
Дата
Msg-id 20190718205750.GA23460@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Ответы Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On 2019-Jul-18, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:30 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote:
> > That version works as well on 12 HEAD. It passes "check world" and the
> > Debian testsuite on top of that running 10->12 upgrade tests.
> 
> Pushed a slightly refined version of the same patch back to the v11 branch.

Thank you!

I wonder what the consequences are in a system that doesn't have
assertions enabled.  Do we just end up with an "upgraded" cached
metapage, and no further ill effects?  That seems pretty benign ...
I hope we don't end up with an expected v4 metapage or something crazy
like that?  (I suppose we would have noticed.)

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«