Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)« |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20190718205750.GA23460@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)« (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #15896: pg_upgrade from 10-or-earlier: TRAP: FailedAssertion(»!(metad->btm_version >= 3)«
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2019-Jul-18, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 2:30 AM Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> wrote: > > That version works as well on 12 HEAD. It passes "check world" and the > > Debian testsuite on top of that running 10->12 upgrade tests. > > Pushed a slightly refined version of the same patch back to the v11 branch. Thank you! I wonder what the consequences are in a system that doesn't have assertions enabled. Do we just end up with an "upgraded" cached metapage, and no further ill effects? That seems pretty benign ... I hope we don't end up with an expected v4 metapage or something crazy like that? (I suppose we would have noticed.) -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: