Hi,
On 2019-07-16 19:26:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > They don't preclude each other though. E.g. it'd be sensible to have both
>
> >> Per gripe from Ken Tanzer. Back-patch to 9.6. The issue exists
> >> further back, but before 9.6 the code looks very different and it
> >> doesn't actually know whether the "var" name matches anything,
> >> so I desisted from trying to fix it.
>
> > and "Backpatch: 9.6-" or such.
>
> I've wondered for some time what you think the "-" means in this.
Up to master. Occasionally there's bugs that only need to be fixed in
some back branches etc.
Greetings,
Andres Freund