Greetings,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 2019-Jul-10, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Good, so I think we all now agree we have to put the nonce
> > (pg_class.oid, LSN, page-number) though the cipher using the secret.
>
> Actually, why do you need the page number in the nonce? The LSN already
> distinguishes pages -- you can't have two pages with the same LSN, can
> you? (I do think you can have multiple writes of the same page with
> different LSNs, if you change hint bits and don't write WAL about it,
> but maybe we should force CRC enabled in encrypted tables, which I think
> closes this hole?)
The point about the LSN not changing is definitely a very good one.. I
agree that we should require checksums to deal with that possibility.
Thanks,
Stephen