On 2019-Jul-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> (There is also precedent for redirecting the extension function to the
> internal one by changing the SQL-level function definition using CREATE
> OR REPLACE FUNCTION ... LANGUAGE INTERNAL. But that seems more
> complicated and would require a new extension version.
One issue with this approach is that it forces the internal function to
remain unchanged forever. That seems OK in this particular case.
> It could maybe be included if the extension version is changed for
> other reasons.)
Maybe add a comment in the control file (?) so that we remember to do it
then.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services