On 2019-Jun-14, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> >> Hm, I don't get that warning. Does this patch silence it, please?
>
> > Uh, no patch attached? But initializing the variable where it's
> > declared would certainly silence it.
>
> BTW, after looking around a bit I wonder if this complaint isn't
> exposing an actual logic bug. Shouldn't skip_tuple_lock have
> a lifetime similar to first_time?
I think you're right. I should come up with a test case that exercises
that case.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services