Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Fetter
Тема Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs
Дата
Msg-id 20190603231428.GQ12249@fetter.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs  (Elvis Pranskevichus <elprans@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:45:51AM -0400, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
> Currently, WITH a AS NOT MATERIALIZED (INSERT ...) would silently 
> disregard the "NOT MATERIALIZED" instruction and execute the data-
> modifying CTE to completion (as per the long-standing DML CTE rule).
> 
> This seems like an omission to me.  Ideally, the presence of an explicit 
> "NOT MATERIALIZED" clause on a data-modifying CTE should disable the 
> "run to completion" logic.

It might be worth documenting the fact that NOT MATERIALIZED doesn't
affect DML CTEs, just as it doesn't affect statements with volatile
functions and recursive CTEs.

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Use of multi-column gin index
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WITH NOT MATERIALIZED and DML CTEs