On 2019-06-01 15:37:43 -0400, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 12:22:10PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2019-06-01 15:09:46 -0400, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> While going through the table AM callbacks, I have bumped into a
> >> couple of references to heap. I think that we should make that more
> >> generic by using the term "table" as done when opening relations and
> >> such. Attached is a cleanup patch.
> >
> > I'm unbothered by this, but I'm also not opposed to changing this. It's
> > largely just keeping the previous code / comment.
> >
> >> While on it, I found a set of typos which looked like a copy-pasto
> >> which got spread => "index_nfo".
> >
> > Yea, we should fix this.
>
> Thanks. Do you mind if I fix both then?
I don't mind at all (although it's imo not a fix for the s/heap/table)!
- Andres