Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?
Дата
Msg-id 20190527080512.GB25901@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 09:22:42AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> The original patch used -o in pg_verify_checksums, the discussion of which
> started in the below mail:
>
> https://postgr.es/m/20180228194242.qbjasdtwm2yj5rqg%40alvherre.pgsql
>
> Since -f was already used for “force check”, -r ended up being used.  Now that
> there no longer is a -f flag in pg_checksums, it can be renamed.

Interesting point.  Thanks for sharing.
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BEFORE UPDATE trigger on postgres_fdw table not work
Следующее
От: Michael Banck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?